1) ADDING MULTIDISCIPLINARY ADVISORY BOARDS
to every probation district, so that probation officers are no longer a potential solo, centralized, under-educated, uninformed, unqualified decision-maker exercising inappropriate social authority concerning the medical, safety, holistic wellbeing, and reintegration needs of each person on probation; rather, transferring decision-making authority to a more holistic and educated body of multidisciplinary experts who can better discern individual circumstances and more holistically care for individual and societal wellbeing, and accordingly can thus advise the courts with a higher degree of competence compared to the current systems.
2) ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR PEOPLE ON PROBATION TO SEEK ADVOCACY
through these Multidisciplinary Advisory Boards to assure that individual, family, and community safety needs are tended to, especially in terms of accessibility of appropriate medical care and trauma-informed support as part of the reintegration process, particularly to ensure they have someone to reach out to if their medical needs and basic human needs are being harmed by the limited structures of the current probation system itself.
3) GRANTING THESE MULTIDISCIPLINARY ADVISORY BOARDS A VOICE
with the judges, in place of the current role probation officers play (regardless of their lack of expertise-based qualifications or empirical knowledge) in making recommendations regarding access to medical care and other important quality-of-life factors related to reintegration, as well as a voice for processes related to probation status, such as consequences of administrative violations, or requests for early termination of probation or supervised release.